SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Weight discordance and perinatal mortality in monoamniotic twin pregnancies: analysis of the MONOMONO, NorSTAMP and STORK multiple pregnancy cohorts.

Saccone, G; Khalil, A; Thilaganathan, B; Glinianaia, SV; Berghella, V; D'Antonio, F; MONOMONO; NorSTAMP; STORK research collaboratives (2019) Weight discordance and perinatal mortality in monoamniotic twin pregnancies: analysis of the MONOMONO, NorSTAMP and STORK multiple pregnancy cohorts. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. ISSN 1469-0705 https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20357
SGUL Authors: Thilaganathan, Baskaran Khalil, Asma

[img] PDF Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 30 June 2020.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (1MB)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore the risk of perinatal mortality in monochorionic monoamniotic (MCMA) twin pregnancies complicated by inter-twin birthweight (BW) discordance. METHODS: This analysis includes data on 242 MCMA twin pregnancies (484 fetuses) from three major research collaboratives on twin pregnancies (MONOMONO, STORK and NorSTAMP). The primary aim was to quantify the risk of intrauterine (IUD), neonatal (NND) and perinatal (PND) death comparing weight discordance at birth from ≥ 10% up to ≥30%. The secondary objectives were to investigate the role of fetal monitoring (inpatient vs outpatient) in modifying the risk of mortality in weight discordant pregnancies, and to explore the diagnostic accuracy of BW in predicting mortality. Logistic regression and AUC analyses were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: The risk of IUD in MCMA twin pregnancies increased significantly from an OR=2.4 (95% CI 1.1 to 5.6, p=0.050) for a ≥20% discordance to an OR=4.4 (95% CI 1.3 to 14.4, p=0.001) for a ≥30% discordance compared to lower cut-off groups. This association remained significant on logistic regression analysis. However, weight discordance had a low predictive accuracy for mortality with an AUC of 0.60 (95% CI 0.46 to 0.73), 0.52 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.724) and 0.57 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.68) for IUD, NND and PND, respectively. There was no difference in the risk of overall IUD, single IUD, double IUD, NND and PND between pregnancies managed as inpatient compared to outpatient for all levels of discordance. CONCLUSION: MCMA twin pregnancies with birthweight discordances ≥20% are at increased risk of fetal demise, signaling a need for increased levels of monitoring. Despite this, its predictive accuracy for mortality is low, thus detection of BW alone should not trigger intervention (eg: iatrogenic delivery). Finally, the current data does not demonstrate an advantage for inpatient over outpatient management in these cases. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Saccone, G. , Khalil, A. , Thilaganathan, B. , Glinianaia, S. V., Berghella, V. , D'Antonio, F. , , , , and , (2019), Weight discordance and perinatal mortality in monoamniotic twin pregnancies: analysis of the MONOMONO, NorSTAMP and STORK multiple pregnancy cohorts. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. Accepted Author Manuscript, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20357. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.
Keywords: cesarean delivery, chorionicity, cord accident, cord entanglement, health care, monochorionic, multiple gestation, perinatal death, respiratory distress syndrome, twin pregnancy, MONOMONO, NorSTAMP, STORK research collaboratives, 1114 Paediatrics And Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Journal or Publication Title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
ISSN: 1469-0705
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
27 May 2019Published Online
20 May 2019Accepted
Publisher License: Publisher's own licence
PubMed ID: 31132179
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: http://sgultest.da.ulcc.ac.uk/id/eprint/110918
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20357

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item