SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Deleterious Effects of Cold Air Inhalation on Coronary Physiological Indices in Patients With Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Williams, RP; Asrress, KN; Lumley, M; Arri, S; Patterson, T; Ellis, H; Manou-Stathopoulou, V; Macfarlane, C; Chandran, S; Moschonas, K; et al. Williams, RP; Asrress, KN; Lumley, M; Arri, S; Patterson, T; Ellis, H; Manou-Stathopoulou, V; Macfarlane, C; Chandran, S; Moschonas, K; Oakeshott, P; Lockie, T; Chiribiri, A; Clapp, B; Perera, D; Plein, S; Marber, MS; Redwood, SR (2018) Deleterious Effects of Cold Air Inhalation on Coronary Physiological Indices in Patients With Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease. Journal of the American Heart Association, 17 (4). e008837. ISSN 2047-9980 https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.008837
SGUL Authors: Oakeshott, Philippa

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (2MB) | Preview
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (78kB)
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) (Figures) Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB)

Abstract

Background Cold air inhalation during exercise increases cardiac mortality, but the pathophysiology is unclear. During cold and exercise, dual‐sensor intracoronary wires measured coronary microvascular resistance (MVR) and blood flow velocity (CBF), and cardiac magnetic resonance measured subendocardial perfusion. Methods and Results Forty‐two patients (62±9 years) undergoing cardiac catheterization, 32 with obstructive coronary stenoses and 10 without, performed either (1) 5 minutes of cold air inhalation (5°F) or (2) two 5‐minute supine‐cycling periods: 1 at room temperature and 1 during cold air inhalation (5°F) (randomized order). We compared rest and peak stress MVR, CBF, and subendocardial perfusion measurements. In patients with unobstructed coronary arteries (n=10), cold air inhalation at rest decreased MVR by 6% (P=0.41), increasing CBF by 20% (P<0.01). However, in patients with obstructive stenoses (n=10), cold air inhalation at rest increased MVR by 17% (P<0.01), reducing CBF by 3% (P=0.85). Consequently, in patients with obstructive stenoses undergoing the cardiac magnetic resonance protocol (n=10), cold air inhalation reduced subendocardial perfusion (P<0.05). Only patients with obstructive stenoses performed this protocol (n=12). Cycling at room temperature decreased MVR by 29% (P<0.001) and increased CBF by 61% (P<0.001). However, cold air inhalation during cycling blunted these adaptations in MVR (P=0.12) and CBF (P<0.05), an effect attributable to defective early diastolic CBF acceleration (P<0.05) and associated with greater ST‐segment depression (P<0.05). Conclusions In patients with obstructive coronary stenoses, cold air inhalation causes deleterious changes in MVR and CBF. These diminish or abolish the normal adaptations during exertion that ordinarily match myocardial blood supply to demand.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH)
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of the American Heart Association
ISSN: 2047-9980
Dates:
DateEvent
17 July 2018Published
11 April 2018Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
FS/11/90/29087British Heart FoundationUNSPECIFIED
FS/11/43/28760British Heart FoundationUNSPECIFIED
FS/10/62/28409British Heart FoundationUNSPECIFIED
RE/08/003British Heart FoundationUNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIEDEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilUNSPECIFIED
088641/Z/09/ZWellcome TrustUNSPECIFIED
URI: http://sgultest.da.ulcc.ac.uk/id/eprint/109862
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.008837

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item