SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews.

Welsh, EJ; Normansell, RA; Cates, CJ (2015) Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med, 25. p. 15019. ISSN 2055-1010 https://doi.org/10.1038/npjpcrm.2015.19
SGUL Authors: Cates, Christopher Joseph Welsh, Emma Jane Normansell, Rebecca Alice

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (125kB) | Preview
Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Keywords: Humans, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Humans, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Meta-Analysis as Topic
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH)
Journal or Publication Title: NPJ Prim Care Respir Med
ISSN: 2055-1010
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
19 March 2015Published
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
PubMed ID: 25789911
Web of Science ID: WOS:000351846800002
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: http://sgultest.da.ulcc.ac.uk/id/eprint/107864
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1038/npjpcrm.2015.19

Statistics

Item downloaded times since 21 Mar 2017.

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item